Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Hardaway v. United States of America
as 17-285
Plaintiff:
John Does, 1-3
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lena Hardaway and Angelene Hardaway
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Merrick B. Garland, Chief Judge, In his official capacity as Justice for violation of color of law only, Deborah Robinson, Judge, In her official capacity as Justice or violation of color of law only and others
Defendant:
John Does, 1-4
Doe et al v. USA et al
as 3:2016cv00760
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and John Does
Defendant:
USA, Merrick B. Garland, Deborah Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NAAMJP v. Loretta Lynch
as 15-1982
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MULTIJURISDICTION PRACTICE, MARINNA L. CALLAWAY, JOSE JEHUDA GARCIA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, Chief Judge, RICHARD D. BENNETT, United States District Court for the District of Maryland and others
National Association for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice (NAAMJP), et al. v. Holder et al
as 1:2014cv02110
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr. , Deborah K. Chasanow , Richard D. Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
National Association for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice (NAAMJP) , Marinna L. Callaway , Jose Jehuda Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Derek Jarvis v. Deborah Chasanow
as 11-1249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK N. JARVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, Chief Judge, US District Court for the District of Maryland, CHARLES B. DAY, Magistrate Judge, US District Court for the District of Maryland, PETER J. MESSITTE, Judge, US District Court for the District of Maryland and others
Jarvis v. Chasanow et al
as 8:2011cv00627
Plaintiff:
Derek N. Jarvis
Defendant:
Deborah K. Chasanow, Charles B. Day, Peter J. Messitte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
