Cases 11 - 20 of 101
Dees v. Smith et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00382
Plaintiff:
Charles Gene Dees, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Smith and Officer Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Hamm et al
as 2:2022cv00585
Plaintiff:
Glennie Dee Davis
Defendant:
John Hamm and Cam Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reaves v. Ford Motor
as 3:2022cv00544
Plaintiff:
Clayborn Dee Reaves
Defendant:
Ford Motor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Miller v. Davidson Homes LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Mike Miller
Defendant:
Davidson Homes LLC, Davidson Home Group LLC, Elite Housing Management and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Murphy v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 5:2021cv01548
Plaintiff:
Randall Dee Murphy
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Collings et al v Marshall County, Alabama et al
as 4:2021cv00707
Defendant:
James Dee Walker, Timothy Allen Jolley, Albertville City, Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
J Monroe Johnson and Eujena Rogers Collings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chappell v. Marshall County, Alabama et al
as 4:2021cv00696
Defendant:
Dekalb County, Alabama, Alabama Department of Human Resources, Nancy T Buckner and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Coit Chappell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collings v. Marshall County, Alabama et al
as 4:2021cv00655
Defendant:
James Dee Walker, Timothy Allen Jolley, Mitchell Scott Floyd and others
Plaintiff:
Eujena Rogers Collings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Marshall County Alabama et al
as 4:2021cv00519
Defendant:
James Dee Walker, Marshall County Alabama, Timothy Allen Jolley and others
Plaintiff:
J Monroe Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dees v. State of Alabama, The et al
as 2:2021cv00392
Defendant:
State of Alabama, The, A-DOC, Jefferson Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Jammall Dees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
