Cases 31 - 40 of 214
MCCULLAH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
JOHN JAVILLO MCCULLAH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, T. J. WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
PRICE v. TOLBERT et al
as 2:2022cv00346
Plaintiff:
BRICE PRICE
Defendant:
RUSSELL TOLBERT, ZATECKY, CRABB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUECHLER v. KIJAKAZI
as 3:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
JOE DEE BUECHLER
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv03126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zepeda v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2022cv01386
Plaintiff:
Francisco Zepeda
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Dee Dee Brookhart, Lori Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01066
Plaintiff:
Tony Rogers
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Vipin K. Shah, Terry Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dees v. Davis et al
as 1:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Josiah Dees
Defendant:
Alvin Davis, Fritz Rommel and City of Fort Wayne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rogers v. Shah et al
as 3:2022cv00938
Plaintiff:
Tony Rogers
Defendant:
Vipin K. Shah, Terry Harris, Springer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Brookhart et al
as 1:2022cv02330
Plaintiff:
Jeryme Morgan
Defendant:
Dee Dee Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Gomez et al
as 3:2022cv00860
Plaintiff:
Maurice S. Johnson
Defendant:
David Gomez, Graves, Stateville Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
