Cases 31 - 40 of 129
Partin et al v. Gevatoski et al
as 6:2019cv01948
Defendant:
Benton County Sheriffs Office, State of Oregon, Linn County Sheriffs Office and others
Plaintiff:
Alanna Nicole Partin and Nicholas Jon Partin
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Hejazi v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 6:2019cv01553
Defendant:
Lane County, Ellen Rosenblum, State of Oregon and others
Plaintiff:
Hamid Michael Hejazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gustafson v. City of Medford et al
as 1:2019cv01501
Defendant:
City of Medford, Attorneys Office, City of Medford, Public Works Department, Office of the Governor, Kate Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Gustafson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States Department of Justice v. Dyno Nobel, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00984
Defendant:
Dyno Nobel, Inc.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Adeyinka v. Barrs et al
as 3:2019cv00943
Defendant:
Brady Barrs, Ms. Armstong, Texas Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Adewale Adeyinka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Barclay v. Oregon Department of Justice et al
as 6:2019cv00683
Plaintiff:
Peter Barclay
Defendant:
Daniel R. Murphy, Glen D. Baisinger and Oregon Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giffen v. FBI et al
as 3:2018cv02225
Defendant:
Kimberly Seymour, US Marshalls, Todd Bofferding and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Giffen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giffen v. FBI et al
as 3:2018cv02215
Respondent:
Kimberly Seymour, Judge Mustafa Kasubhai, Todd Bofferding and others
Petitioner:
Todd Giffen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Toreson v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 6:2018cv02141
Plaintiff:
Theodore O. Toreson
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steltz v. US Dept. of Justice et al
as 6:2018cv02037
Plaintiff:
Adam Steltz
Defendant:
Gale Rieder, Kurt Miller and US Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
