Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cooley v. Alabama Department of Mental Health
as 1:2023cv00475
Petitioner:
Jesse Jr. Cooley
Respondent:
Alabama Department of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Day v. Alabama Department of Mental Health (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00627
Plaintiff:
Donald K. Day
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Day v. Alabama Department of Mental Health (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00579
Plaintiff:
Donald K. Day
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooley v. Alabama Department of Mental Health
as 1:2022cv00325
Petitioner:
Jesse Cooley, Jr.
Respondent:
Alabama Department of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Alabama Department of Mental Health et al
as 7:2021cv01436
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Baker
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Mental Health, Humphrey and . Archibald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonner v. Humliz et al
as 7:2021cv01269
Plaintiff:
Eric Hugh Bonner
Defendant:
Caleb Andy Humliz, Pickens County Sheriff's Department, Alabama Department of Mental Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01344
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00669
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. State of Alabama Department of Mental Health et al (MAG+)
as 2:2018cv01068
Plaintiff:
Montrail Russell
Defendant:
State of Alabama Department of Mental Health and Taylor Hardin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
