Cases 41 - 50 of 100
Price v. Cleveland County Department of Social Services
as 1:2017cv00292
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Sue Price
Defendant:
Cleveland County Department of Social Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Norton v. Columbus County Department of Social Services et al
as 7:2017cv00171
Plaintiff:
Calvin Tyrone Norton
Defendant:
Columbus County Department of Social Services , Algernon McKenzie , David S. Tedder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEAL v. PAGE et al
as 1:2017cv00649
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LEE NEAL
Defendant:
SAM PAGE, ROCKINGHAM COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT and ROCKINGHAM COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBERTSON v. ULSTER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
as 1:2017cv00370
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ROBERTSON
Defendant:
ULSTER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWMAN v. GRICE et al
as 1:2017cv00270
Plaintiff:
MARCUS BOWMAN
Defendant:
DAVID GRICE , DEIDRA THOMPSON and DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ROBERTSON et al v. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
as 1:2017cv00235
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ROBERTSON and KERI ROBERTSON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glidewell v. North Carolina, et al
as 1:2016cv00371
Plaintiff:
Ryan Allan Glidewell
Defendant:
North Carolina, Department of Social Services and Toni Alleyne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pratt v. Pitt County Department of Social Services et al
as 4:2016cv00198
Plaintiff:
Constance Pratt
Defendant:
Pitt County Department of Social Services, Retha Albriton and Sofia Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00125
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Pyatt v. Macon County et al
as 1:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
Marialena Pyatt
Defendant:
Macon County , Macon County Department of Social Services , Jane Kimsey and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
