Cases 71 - 80 of 80
Dews v. State of Arizona et al
as 2:2007cv01308
Petitioner:
Leon Dews
Respondent:
State of Arizona, State of California, Arizona Attorney General, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Osman v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2007cv01018
Plaintiff:
Ibrahim S Osman
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Lilia Gonzales and Kimberli Dewing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dews v. State of Arizona Superior Court, et al
as 2:2007cv01242
Petitioner:
Leon Dews
Respondent:
State of Arizona Superior Court and California Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dews v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2007cv01165
Plaintiff:
Leon Dews
Defendant:
Arizona, State of and Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valdez v. Magnum et al
as 2:2007cv01131
Plaintiff:
Joey Anthony Valdez
Defendant:
J Kenneth Magnum, Smith C Shellie, Gerald R Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dews v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2007cv01003
Petitioner:
Leon Dews
Respondent:
Arizona, State of, Kristin Sherman and Alyson Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horwath v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
as 5:2007cv02623
Plaintiff:
Terry Dew Horwath
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Dews v. CCG, LLC
as 4:2007cv00206
Plaintiff:
Claudia Dews
Defendant:
CCG, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Dew v. Curry
as 4:2007cv01818
Petitioner:
David Leon Dew
Respondent:
Ben Curry
Miscellaneou:
Board of Parole Hearings and Arnold Schwarzenegger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
