Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Johnny Gregory v. Whitfield County Superior Court Judge, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-13603
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHNNY BRETT GREGORY
Defendant / Appellee: WHITFIELD COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE, PAT GIDDENE, AMBER WINKLER and others
In re: Johnny Gregory
as 23-11379
Petitioner: In re: JOHNNY BRETT GREGORY
Respondent: ROBERT B. ADAMS, PAT GIDDENE, AMBER WINKLER and others
FOXX et al v. DOUGLAS et al
as 1:2023cv00205
Plaintiff: DARRELL FOXX, DUNBAR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LLC and PAUL L. DUNBAR GROUP, INC.
Defendant: MICHAEL DOUGLAS, CHRISTOPHER CURRY, MAYOR BARBRA MALLET and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Holmes v. The United States of America Do not docket in this case. File only in 4:11-cr-00679-11.
as 4:2022cv03336
Petitioner: David Dewayne Holmes
Respondent: The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
In re: Johnny Gregory
as 22-10322
Petitioner: In re: JOHNNY BRETT GREGORY
Respondent: JUDGE ROBERT B. ADAMS, Superior Court Judge, Whitfield County, PAT UNKNOWN, Judge Adam's Clerk, AMBER WINKLER, Civil Clerk's Office of Whitfield County and others
In re: David Holmes
as 19-20289
Petitioner: In re: DAVID DEWAYNE HOLMES
Holmes v. Equifax Information Services et al
as 1:2018cv00116
Defendant: Equifax Information Services and Selene Finance
Plaintiff: Val Dewayne Holmes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Barr v. Holmes et al
as 4:2018cv00204
Defendant: Det. Cox, Whitfield County Sheriffs Office, Sgt. Darren Pierce and others
Plaintiff: Michael Anthony Barr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barr v. Holmes et al
as 1:2018cv04214
Defendant: Det. Cox, Whitfield County Sheriffs Office, Sgt. Darren Pierce and others
Plaintiff: Michael Anthony Barr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: David Holme
as 16-20428
Movant: In re: DAVID DEWAYNE HOLMES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?