Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Scott v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 9:2026cv00468
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dewey Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Dewey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv00912
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Dewey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Barnett v. Unknown et al
as 1:2026cv00145
Plaintiff:
Dewey Austin Barnett
Defendant:
Alex Unknown and Gregory Hancock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Stacey
as 4:2026cv00948
Plaintiff:
Dewey A. Barnett
Defendant:
Presiding Judge Brenda Stacey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Dewey Hospital et al
as 2:2026cv01067
Petitioner:
Shyra Jackson
Respondent:
Dewey Hospital and Aurora Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Barnett v. Savoie
as 4:2026cv00936
Plaintiff:
Dewey A. Barnett
Defendant:
Gina Savoie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Hancock
as 1:2026cv00141
Petitioner:
Dewey A Barnett
Respondent:
Gregory Hancock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnett v. Hancock
as 1:2026cv00139
Petitioner:
Dewey A. Barnett
Respondent:
Gregory Hancock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GRIFFIN v. STATE OF WISCONSIN et al
as 1:2026cv02090
Plaintiff:
IESHUH GRIFFIN
Defendant:
STATE OF WISCONSIN, TONY EVERS, FROEDERT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL & THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Barnett v. Hancock
as 1:2026cv00140
Petitioner:
Dewey A Barnett
Respondent:
Gregory Hancock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
