Cases 41 - 50 of 85
Stevenson v. DG Retail, LLC
as 3:2020cv00305
Defendant:
DG Retail, LLC
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Stevenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARR v. DG RETAIL LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00110
Defendant:
DG RETAIL LLC and DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
KAYLA MARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goble v. DG Retail, LLC et al
as 6:2019cv01976
Defendant:
DG Retail, LLC and Kevin Wagner
Plaintiff:
James Goble
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Clark v. DG Retail, LLC
as 3:2019cv00897
Defendant:
DG Retail, LLC
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flores v. DG Retail, LLC.
as 1:2019cv05670
Defendant:
DG Retail, LLC., d/b/a Dollar General, Kaiyah King, individually, DG Retail, LLC. and others
Plaintiff:
Abdias Flores
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ashlock v. Dollar General Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv02291
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
DG Retail, LLC and Dollar General Corporation
Plaintiff:
Dolly Ashlock
3Rd Party Defendant:
Heartland Coca-Cola Bottling Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shadid v. LDG Springfield IL LLC et al
as 3:2019cv03084
Plaintiff:
Crystal Shadid
Defendant:
DG Retail LLC and LDG Springfield IL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Oren, et al v. Dollar General Corporation, et al
as 19-8008
Respondent:
Bruce Gooel, Janine Harvey, Howard Horgan and others
Petitioner:
Dolgencorp, LLC, Dollar General Corporation, Dollar General and others
Not Classified By Court:
Matthew Wait, Chuck Hill, Will Sisemore and others
Walters v. Dollar General Corporation et al
as 6:2019cv01010
Defendant:
DG Retail LLC and Dollar General Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jane Walters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hubbard et al v. Dolgencorp et al
as 1:2017cv01133
Plaintiff:
Sherlyn Huffman, Brandi Hubbard, Holly Jimenez and others
Defendant:
DG Retail LLC, Dolgencorp LLC and Dollar General Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
