Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Joseph v. DHL Express (USA) Inc.
as 1:2024cv11048
Plaintiff:
Jefferson Joseph
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Endres v. Moody et al
as 1:2023cv12051
Plaintiff:
Steven P. Endres and Pro se litigant Steven P. Endres
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Ken Paxton, City and County of San Francisco, California and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Thorpe et al v. Exel Inc.
as 1:2022cv11033
Plaintiff:
Mark Thorpe, Nicholas Moon and LaToya Chavis-Burton
Defendant:
Exel Inc. doing business as DHL Supply Chain (USA)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Caizzi v. DHL Express (USA), Inc.
as 1:2021cv11843
Plaintiff:
Gregory Caizzi
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA), Inc.
DHL Express (USA), Inc. v. International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Local 25
as 1:2020cv12215
Plaintiff:
DHL Express (USA), Inc.
Defendant:
International Brotherood of Teamsters, Local 25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 251 v. DHLNH, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00076
Defendant:
DHL Express, (USA), Inc. and DHLNH, LLC
Plaintiff:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 251
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Fofana v. DHL Express (USA), Inc.
as 1:2017cv11291
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Fofana
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv10744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Casper v. DHL Global Customer Solutions (USA), Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv40035
Plaintiff:
Rob Casper
Defendant:
DHL Global Customer Solutions (USA), Inc. and DHL Customer Solutions & Innovations (USA), Inc.
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
