Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Alex Ulloa v. Warden Fort Dix FCI
as 26-2486
Plaintiff: ALEX ULLOA
Defendant: WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
In re: Eustacio Gregorio-Meza
as 26-2388
Petitioner: In re: EUSTACIO GREGORIO-MEZA
Respondent: WARDEN FORT DIX FCI and EVELYN PADIN
Edwards v. Warden of FCI Fort Dix
as 2:2026cv05334
Petitioner: Adrian Darnell Edwards
Respondent: WARDEN OF F.C.I. FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Edwards v. Warden of FCI Fort Dix
as 7:2026cv00392
Petitioner: Adrian Darnell Edwards
Respondent: Warden of FCI Fort Dix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GONZALEZ-LOZA v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2026cv04977
Petitioner: JAVIER GONZALEZ-LOZA
Respondent: WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Angela Reading v. Township of Hanover, et al
as 26-1963
Plaintiff: ANGELA READING
Defendant: TOWNSHIP OF HANOVER, ROBERT DUFF, in his individual capacity and in his officialcapacity as Chief of Police for NorthHanover Township, HELEN PAYNE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv04609
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PULLIUM v. WARDEN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2026cv04596
Petitioner: JAMIE DARNELL PULLIUM
Respondent: WARDEN OF FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-5366
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Toles, John v. Janesville Police Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2026cv00335
Plaintiff: John Kenneth Toles
Defendant: Janesville Police Department, Officer Jason Reese, Officer Jaclyn Mader and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?