Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Tucson et al v. City of Seattle et al
as 2:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
ROBIN SNYDER, MONSIEREE DE CASTRO, ERIK MOYA-DELGADO and others
Defendant:
City of Seattle, ALEXANDER PATTON, TRAVIS JORDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2022cv05919
Plaintiff:
Karen Martinez
Defendant:
Pierce County, Kim DeMarco, Sandi Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Garnica-Melgoza v. Fortney et al
as 2:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Daniel Garnica-Melgoza
Defendant:
Adam Fortney, Evan Twept, Grant Kendall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kivlin v. City of Bellevue et al
as 2:2020cv00790
Defendant:
John Does 1-2, Carl Kleinknecht, City of Bellevue and others
Plaintiff:
John M. Kivlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hertzog v. Dobson et al
as 2:2020cv00009
Defendant:
Spokane Eye Clinic, John Does 1-2, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
George Philip Hertzog, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strand v. Jewett et al
as 2:2019cv01274
Defendant:
Mellissa Derksema, Carolyn Jewett and John Doe 1-2
Plaintiff:
Hamal Jacob Strand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Livermore v. Tonhofer et al
as 4:2018cv05075
Plaintiff:
Glen A Livermore
Defendant:
Debra Tonhofer, John Smith, Robert Herzog and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Babb v. City of Tacoma et al
as 3:2018cv05215
Plaintiff:
Demond Lavelle Babb
Defendant:
City of Tacoma , John Does 1-2, Jane Does 1-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Duncan v. Snohomish County et al
as 2:2017cv01072
Defendant:
Snohomish County , Denny Juvenile Justice Center , Marilyn Finsen and others
Plaintiff:
Shane S Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2017cv01071
Defendant:
Snohomish County , TIM ODELL , Marilyn Finsen and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe Finsen and Shane S Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
