Cases 81 - 90 of 103
SCURLOCK v. LAPPINS et al
as 1:2010cv01833
Plaintiff:
ALONZO EDWARD SCURLOCK
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPINS, J. L. NORWOOD, TERRY O'BRIEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wesley et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv07670
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Wesley
Defendant:
City of New York, John Does 1 Through 10 and Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer et al v. Clackamas County Oregon et al
as 3:2010cv01147
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Buck, Sean Kelly McKeon and Johnny Rothy Palmer
Defendant:
Clackamas County Oregon, Clackamas County Sheriff's Office and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCarthy v. Ette et al
as 2:2010cv00048
Plaintiff:
Roman Sonny McCarthy
Defendant:
Steve Ette, Michael Salvagni, Mark Guenther and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Morrison et al
as 2:2010cv00034
Plaintiff:
Ronald Williams
Defendant:
Beverly Morrison, Cleveland Rayford, Douglas Prudden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jorge Guadarrama v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 09-57038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JORGE GUADARRAMA
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary, LARRY SMALL and DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Guadarrama v. Cate et al
as 3:2009cv02440
Plaintiff:
Jorge Guadarrama
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Larry Small and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tirey v. Fairbank et al
as 9:2009cv00146
Plaintiff:
Roland Tirey
Defendant:
Sandra Fairbank, Ron Alsbury, Sam Lemaich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roland Tirey v. Melissa Strecker, et al
as 09-35778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROLAND D. TIREY
Defendant - Appellee:
MELISSA STRECKER, JAN ULLOM and DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Theodore Thompson v. City of Dallas Texas, et al
as 09-10788
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THEODORE J. THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, DALLAS POLICE DEPARTMENT, FIVE UNKNOWN NAMED POLICE OFFICERS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
