Cases 1 - 10 of 11
BARNHART et al v. BRANHAM et al
as 4:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
STAN BARNHART and DONNA BARNHART
Defendant:
MIKE BRANHAM, GREG DAY, TONY SEIDL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADEGBOYEGA v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv01724
Plaintiff:
KEHINDE ADEGBOYEGA
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00678
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
THAYYIL v. INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2021cv00165
Defendant:
NOS. 1-25 JOHN DOES, INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY, INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Thayyil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00826
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00013
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HUBBARD v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2018cv01229
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONS SERVICES, LLC, CORIZON CORRECTIONS MEDICAL CORPORATION, JOHN DOE, 1-25 and others
John Doe:
BYRON HUBBARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAINES v. G.L.A. COLLECTION COMPANY, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv00788
Defendant:
G.L.A. COLLECTION COMPANY, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-25
Plaintiff:
CHAKIA SAINES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
STOLTZFUS et al v. HUTCHINS et al
as 2:2017cv00359
Defendant:
GEOFFREY CANFIELD, SHAWN CLOVER, JUSTIN COLE and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN RIEHL and JOHN STOLTZFUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMPSON v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN SERVICES et al
as 1:2014cv01278
Defendant:
KRISTA CAUHEY, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN SERVICES, DOES 1-25 and others
Plaintiff:
JERRI THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
