Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Charles Talbert v. Correction Dental Associates, et al
as 20-2057
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. PATEL, DR. LISCO, DR. FOWLER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES TALBERT
Warren v. Jefferson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2019cv03376
Defendant:
Jefferson County Sheriff's Office, Jefferson County Department of Health and Human Services, Behavioral Health Unit-Correct Care Solutions and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Marvin Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fowler, Kenneth v. Tegels, Lizzie et al
as 3:2019cv00704
Defendant:
Dr. Lui, Melinda Derus, Ms. Dougherty and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Fowler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Talbert v. Correctional Dental Associates, et al
as 19-2369
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. PATEL, SIGY GEORGE, DR. FOWLER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES TALBERT
TALBERT v. CORRECTIONAL DENTAL ASSOCIATES et al
as 2:2018cv05112
Defendant:
SIDDHARTH SAGREIYA, SIGY GEORGE, EDWARD BOWMAN and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen v. Dallet et al
as 2:2016cv01677
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Bowen
Defendant:
Rebecca F Dallet, Scott Walker, Wisconsin Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv00255
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Bowen
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections , New Lisbon Correctional Institution, Columbia Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walkowiak v. New Lisbon Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2008cv00368
Plaintiff:
Mark J Walkowiak
Defendant:
New Lisbon Correctional Institution, Mr. Fuchs, Ana Boatwright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schaller v. HEINZL et al
as 3:2008cv00403
Defendant:
DOCTOR HEINZL and Dr. Reynolds
Plaintiff:
Nick William Schaller, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
