Cases 1 - 10 of 10
VEGA v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv00833
Plaintiff:
FIDEL VEGA
Defendant:
RACHEL THOMPSON, PRADIP PATEL, M.D., JEFFERY WILK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Jones et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
Derrick LaWayne Daniels
Defendant:
Karla Walker Jones, Clevon Randolph, Sgt. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAGLIAFERRO v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2023cv03419
Petitioner:
SALVATORE TAGLIAFERRO
Respondent:
STEVIE M. KNIGHT and DR. TURNER-FOSTER, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SCHER v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2023cv01679
Plaintiff:
TYLER SCHER
Defendant:
WARDEN STEVIE KNIGHT and DR. TURNER-FOSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HENSLEY v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2020cv14976
Defendant:
DR. TURNER-FOSTER, ORTIZ and C.O. NIXON
Plaintiff:
GARY HENSLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2019cv17275
Defendant:
HEAD OF MEDICAL, M. FISHER, DAVID J. STEEL and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasquez v. Hollembaek et al
as 5:2017ct03117
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Luis Vasquez
Defendant:
Warden Hollembaek, Asst. Warden Swain, Doctor Rosenthal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILLIAMS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv06971
Plaintiff:
LARRY WILLIAMS, SR.
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DR. NUGENT, DR. SOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BROWN v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 1:2015cv01141
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. BROWN
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS , VA MEDICAL CENTER and DR. TURNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
v. MALOUF et al
as 1:2009cv02117
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MALOUF
Defendant:
DR. TURNER, DR. LOPES, MR. SPOULDING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
