Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Smith v. Alexander et al
as 2:2024cv02302
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ricardo Smith
Defendant:
Virginia M. Alexander, Robert Duck and Janeen R. Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whyte v. Bell et al
as 3:2023cv01321
Plaintiff:
Darrell Ricardo Whyte
Defendant:
Brenna K. Bell, Jennings H, Jones, Donna Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKennon v. Ross et al
as 1:2023cv01001
Plaintiff:
Justin Mack McKennon
Defendant:
James Ross, Alicia Duck, Jackson Madison County General Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harvison v. Little et al
as 1:2022cv01103
Plaintiff:
Ray Harvison
Defendant:
Christy Little, Jody Pickens, Robert Duck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Duck v. USAble Life Insurance Company (TV1)
as 3:2015cv00155
Plaintiff:
Bentina Duck
Defendant:
USAble Life
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ducks Unlimited, Inc. v. Boondux, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv02885
Plaintiff:
Ducks Unlimited, Inc.
Defendant:
Boondux, LLC and Caleb Sutton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Employment Discrimination
DHIP Holdings, LLC et al v. Nashville Apparel Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00908
Plaintiff:
DHIP Holdings, LLC and Duck Head USA-International, LLC
Defendant:
Nashville Apparel Company, Inc. , Eagle Dry Goods, Inc. , Scott McFadden and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Pinnacle Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
