Cases 11 - 20 of 87
COMER v. MCCASKILL et al
as 1:2021cv00962
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS DERIC COMER
Defendant:
DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS LLC, CALVIN L. MCCASKILL and DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NOC Properties, LLC et al v. Great Smoky Mountains Railroad, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00170
Counter Defendant:
NOC Retail, LLC, Nantahala Outdoor Center, LLC, NOC Properties, LLC and others
Defendant:
NC Department of Transportation, Swain County, U.S. Forest Service and others
Plaintiff:
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
Counter Claimant:
Great Smoky Mountains Railroad, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC v. Jones et al
as 3:2020cv00711
Plaintiff:
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
Defendant:
Chad A. Jones and Bonnie E. Jones
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00696
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Huff v. Duke Energy Carolinas LLC
as 0:2020cv03291
Defendant:
Duke Energy Carolinas LLC
Plaintiff:
Michelle Huff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wood Creek Properties of Landrum LLC v. Duke Energy Carolinas LLC et al
as 7:2020cv03249
Defendant:
Duke Energy Carolinas LLC and Duke Energy Corporation
Plaintiff:
Wood Creek Properties of Landrum LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
as 3:2020cv00451
Defendant:
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
Plaintiff:
Bonnie E Jones and Chad A Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Duke Energy Carolinas LLC v. Shore et al
as 0:2019cv03077
Defendant:
James G Shore and Jan C Shore
Plaintiff:
Duke Energy Carolinas LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
