Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Rouse v. Godfrey et al
as 5:2024ct03115
Plaintiff: Joshua Lindell Rouse
Defendant: John Godfrey, Marshall Pike, Cathy Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00093
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00304
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
v. VEREEN et al
as 1:2022cv00663
Plaintiff: BILAL RASUL
Defendant: DARREN VEREEN, SPEPHEN OJO, TIMOTHY CISCEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ager v. Hooks et al
as 5:2020ct03382
Defendant: Ms. Bullard, Tracy W. Dailey, Michelle Reynolds and others
Plaintiff: Leon M. Ager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hallinan et al v. Scarantino et al
as 5:2020hc02088
Petitioner: Jorge Luis Maldonado, Anthony Butler, Troy A. Titus and others
Respondent: Michael Carvajal, Warden Thomas Scarantino and Jeffrey Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brooks v. Loveall et al
as 5:2020ct03082
Defendant: Tracy Dailey, Jeffery Loveall, Erik Hooks and others
Plaintiff: Aaron Lee Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RASUL v. VEREEN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01167
Defendant: DARREN SCOTT VEREEN, CHRISTOPHER RICH, MONICA BOND and others
Plaintiff: BILAL RASUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rasul v. Vereen et al
as 5:2019ct03344
Defendant: Darren Scott Vereen, Christopher Rich, Monica Bond and others
Plaintiff: Bilal Rasul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALBERT v. MARION et al
as 1:2019cv01100
Defendant: TRACY DAILEY, SHELTON RODGERS, LARRY MARION and others
Plaintiff: JUSTIN ROSS TALBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?