Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Jeanette Bass v. Andrew Dakuras, et al
as 23-2882
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEANETTE BASS
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW DAKURAS, Sergeant and CITY OF CHICAGO
Dakuras v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 9:2021cv82447
Plaintiff:
Nancy Dakuras
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAKURAS v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2020cv05765
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and ASTRAZENECA LP
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Plaintiff:
JAMES DAKURAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bass v. Sgt. A. Dakuras et al
as 1:2019cv07557
Defendant:
Sgt. A. Dakuras and The City of Chicago
Petitioner:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Bass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pughsley v. Lucern et al
as 3:2018cv50306
Defendant:
J. Maher, Lucern, S. Joiner and others
Plaintiff:
Roy K. Pughsley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pughsley v. Lucern et al
as 3:2018cv50301
Defendant:
J. Maher, S. Joiner, Rochelle Briney and others
Plaintiff:
Roy K. Pughsley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kaufman v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv07491
Defendant:
R. Dakuras, S. Mirus and City of Chicago
Plaintiff:
Asher Kaufman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Khatchik v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv03330
Plaintiff:
Artin Khatchik
Defendant:
Chicago Police Department, Mirus Jr., Galligan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v City of Chicago et al.,
as 1:2016cv03201
Plaintiff:
Tolbert Jones , Colin Craybeek , Onzell Hale Washington and others
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , Sergeant Dakuras , Officer Diblich #36646 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Polaski et al
as 1:2014cv08920
Plaintiff:
Lamon Rogers
Defendant:
James Polaski , A.J. Dakuras , Donald Clark, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
