Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Williams v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01396
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Nicholas Evangelides, Dale Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Williams et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv03581
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams, Lucy Parsons Labs, Daniel Ortiz and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago, David O'Neal Brown, Nicholas Evangelides and others
Petitioner:
SoundThinking, Inc.
Williams et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv03773
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams, Lucy Parsons Labs and Daniel Ortiz
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, David O'Neal Brown, Nicholas Evangelides and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simons v. State of Tennessee and the Tennessee Board of Paroles et al
as 1:2015cv00032
Plaintiff:
Barry P. Simons
Defendant:
State of Tennessee and the Tennessee Board of Paroles, Tennessee Thirty First (31st) Judicial District, Bart Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Potter et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv26207
Plaintiff:
Nancy Potter and Dale Potter
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Potter v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2014cv00424
Plaintiff:
Larry Dale Potter, Jr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lawrence Earl v. Kevin Ballew, et al
as 10-5052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE EARL
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN BALLEW, PHIL BREDESEN, DAVID MITCHELL and others
Lawrence Earl v. Kevin Ballew, et al
as 09-6082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE EARL
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN BALLEW, PHIL BREDESEN, DAVID MITCHELL and others
Lawrence Earl v. Kevin Ballew, et al
as 09-5093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE EARL
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN BALLEW, PHIL BREDESEN, DAVID MITCHELL and others
Yates v. Massey et al
as 3:2008cv00109
Plaintiff:
Robert Yates
Defendant:
John Massey, Jackie Matheny, Dale Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
