Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Miller v. Hedgecock et al
as 6:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Dan Miller
Defendant:
B.J. Hedgecock, Keith Knoll, Brian Columbus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
I.R. a minor v. Petaluma City Schools et al
as 3:2021cv00726
Defendant:
Officer Dan Miller, Kristina Lewis, Amanda M. Lorenzen and others
Plaintiff:
I.R. a minor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Tuck's Restaurant and Bar et al v. Newsom et al
as 2:2020at01115
Defendant:
Attorney General Xavier Baccera, Ed Scofield, Amy Irani and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Paige, The Nevada County Restaurant Coalition, Tuck's Restaurant and Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Tuck's Restaurant and Bar et al v. Newsom et al
as 2:2020cv02256
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Ed Scofield, Amy Irani and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Paige, The Nevada County Restaurant Coalition, Tuck's Restaurant and Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gohranson et al v. Snohomish County et al
as 2:2016cv01124
Plaintiff:
John T. Gohranson
Defendant:
Snohomish County , Robert Trenary, Stuart Andrews M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dan Miller, et al v. City of Wickliffe
as 16-3052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAN MILLER, SUEDE NIGHTS, LLC, JOSEPH CIRINO and others
Plaintiff:
MOSLEY MOTEL OF CLEVELAND, INC. and JULIUS MOSLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF WICKLIFFE
Miller et al v. Wickliffe Ohio, City of
as 1:2012cv01248
Plaintiff:
Dan Miller , Suede Nights, LLC , Joseph Cirino and others
Defendant:
Wickliffe Ohio, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv02625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schmidt v. Village of Forest Park, et al
as 1:2010cv00899
Plaintiff:
Richard Schmidt and Richard Schmidt
Defendant:
Village of Forest Park, Jim Ryan, Daniel Pater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
