Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Gordon v. Crow
as 22-6172
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSHUA DANIEL ALBERT GORDON
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW
GORDON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19097
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CLIFFORD GORDON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gordon v. Crow et al
as 5:2021cv00571
Petitioner:
Joshua Daniel Albert Gordon
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma and Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GORDON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv15226
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL VINCENT GORDON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GORDON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv42401
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL R GORDON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allegro Credit Services, LLC v. Of A Feather, LLC et al.
as 1:2020cv02622
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
jared stammell, Susan Stammell and Of A Feather, LLC
Plaintiff:
Allegro Credit Services, LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
Daniel L Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Montague Walker v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor
as 19-3062
Defendant / Appellee:
SHELLY MANKEY, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, an agency of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, DANIELLE TERNITSKY-GORDON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MONTAGUE WALKER
Not Yet Classified:
THE BEASLEY LAW FIRM and ALVIN F. DE LEVIE
Gordon v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv10510
Plaintiff:
Danielle Patrice Gordon
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
