Cases 1 - 10 of 188
LANS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2024cv06172
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO MICHAEL LANS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY, BARBARA C. STOLTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Goldman-Brown v. Consumers Energy
as 2:2024cv10902
Plaintiff:
Danielle Goldman-Brown
Defendant:
Consumers Energy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brown et al v. Stoner et al
as 1:2023cv01886
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Sarah Brown and Daniel Lynn Brown
Defendant:
Adams County Courtney Stoner, Tyler R. Krause, Jason Gueck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv14022
Plaintiff:
DANIEL EUGENE BROWN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15186
Plaintiff:
DANIEL W BROWN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael Hayes v. The Entity, et al
as 23-35002
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL T. HAYES
Defendant / Appellee:
THE ENTITY, (IDOC), TIMOTHY R. MCKAY, DAVID E. DIETZ and others
Hayes v. IDOC, et al.
as 1:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
Michael T Hayes
Defendant:
IDOC, Jay Christensen, Timothy McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonough v. Smith
as 22-1983
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Edward G. McDonough
Defendant / Appellee:
Youel Smith, individually and as Special District Attorney for The County of Resselaer, New York, AKA Trey Smith
Defendant:
John J. Ogden, Richard McNally Jr., Kevin McGrath and others
Adams v. Middlesex County, et al
as 2:2020cv02112
Plaintiff:
Brandon G Adams
Defendant:
Mathew Johnson, Crossmark, Daniel H Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
