Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Brown, III v. Marten Transport LTD et al
as 2:2023cv07248
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brown, III
Defendant:
Marten Transport LTD, Willie E. Brown and ACE American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Brown v. Smith-Tunlin et al
as 1:2022cv00426
Plaintiff:
Danielle Brown
Defendant:
Racheal Smith-Tunlin and Intellibed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Brown et al v. Navy Federal Credit Union et al
as 4:2021cv01661
Plaintiff:
Darryl Daniel Brown, Sr and Wendy Espadron-Brown
Defendant:
Matthew C Miller, Allen Civil Process, Navy Federal Credit Union and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Estate of Jessica Brown v. City of Lucedale, Mississippi
as 20-60693
Defendant / Appellee:
George County, Mississippi
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Estate of Jessica Danielle Brown
Brown v. Russell et al
as 3:2020cv00126
Defendant:
Jay Russell and Ms Dorthy
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Underwood
as 3:2019cv01706
Petitioner:
Daniel Brown
Respondent:
NFN Underwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv04643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brown et al v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv05782
Plaintiff:
Barbara Ann Brown and Daniel Brown
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sandoz, Inc., Accord Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carroll v. City of Lucedale, Mississippi et al
as 1:2017cv00230
Plaintiff:
Jessica Danielle Brown Carroll
Defendant:
City of Lucedale, Mississippi, George County, Mississippi and Warren Avery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cedric Alexander v. Barcardi and Company, et al
as 16-11717
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC MARK ALEXANDER, On behalf of self and all others similarly situated, also known as Sidric Mark Alexander
Defendant - Appellee:
BARCARDI AND COMPANY, MCCORMICK DISTILLING COMPANY, DIAGEO BEVERAGE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
