Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Jones v. Annucci et al
as 1:2023cv06917
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner Anthony Annucci, Sergeant Joseph and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown et al v. Annucci et al
as 7:2023cv06056
Plaintiff:
Byron K. Brown, Carlos Arriaga, Terrence Turner and others
Defendant:
Commissioner Anthony Annucci, Sergeant Joseph, John Doe and others
Interested Party:
New York State Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Hochul et al
as 9:2023cv00720
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Defendant:
Kathlee C. Hochul, Letitia James, Ann Marie T. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Erie County et al
as 1:2023cv00489
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Defendant:
Erie County, Mark Poloncarz, Michael A. Siragusa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Tope
as 9:2023cv00415
Petitioner:
Daniel Jones
Respondent:
Danielle Tope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Capra
as 9:2022cv01203
Petitioner:
Daniel Jones
Respondent:
Michael Capra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Capra
as 6:2022cv06405
Petitioner:
Daniel Jones
Respondent:
Michael Capra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv00902
Plaintiff:
Candice Danielle Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. Jackie
as 6:2021cv06597
Defendant:
Nurse Jackie and Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Tope
as 9:2021cv01007
Petitioner:
Daniel Jones
Respondent:
Danielle Tope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
