Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Marcel v. United States of America
as 12-5001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Marcel, as Parent and Legal Custodian of Shaniya Heaven Marcel, Jr. also known as Daniel Marcel, infant Ruth OnalishaRodgriguez Marcel, also known as Ruth Marcel and formerly known as Baby Girl Pullin
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, State of New York, Andrew Mark Cuomo, Governor of the State of New York, in his personal and official capacities and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
William Baccaglini, AKA Bill Baccaglini and Jeremiah James Quinlan
Marcel v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv04404
Defendant:
Administration for Children's Services for the City of New York, Jamie Albert, Madelle Amaro and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Marcel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marcel v. State Of New York et al
as 1:2012cv02384
Defendant:
Madelle Amaro, Cheryl Ashby, Liyan Bao and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Marcel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Marcel v. Byrne
as 11-5357
Petitioner - Appellant:
Daniel Marcel
Respondent - Appellee:
Sean M. Byrne, Commissioner of New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services and Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York
Marcel v. Byrne et al
as 1:2011cv04695
Respondent:
Sean M. Byrne and Eric T. Schneiderman
Petitioner:
Daniel Marcel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marcel v. Donovan et al
as 1:2011cv01560
Defendant:
Shaun Donovan and John B. Rhea
Plaintiff:
Daniel Marcel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Poovey v. Habersham et al
as 9:2010cv00964
Plaintiff:
Daniel Marcel Deon Poovey
Defendant:
K Habersham and Cliff McElvogue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UBS Financial Services Inc. v. Matheiu et al
as 1:2008cv10505
Petitioner:
UBS Financial Services Inc.
Respondent:
Adolfo Oscar Matheiu, Maria Ester Andreoli, Eduardo Ernesto Rocha and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
