Cases 21 - 30 of 284
Ruiz v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv01055
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Ruiz
Defendant:
Dean Williams, Roetker, Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIZEMORE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08468
Plaintiff:
DANIEL RAY SIZEMORE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Glover et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv04587
Plaintiff:
Robert Glover, Jerome Givens, Cynthia Corona and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co.), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Glover et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2022cv10261
Plaintiff:
Robert Glover, Jerome Givens, Cynthia Corona and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Whitehill et al v. Ropte et al
as 8:2022cv00373
Plaintiff:
Kyle John Whitehill and Haley Brooke Davis-Whitehill
Defendant:
Daniel Ray Ropte and Little D Trucking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. Metsinger
as 22-60553
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Daniel Ray Metsinger, also known as Daniel Woods
Garcia v. Watson
as 22-10863
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daniel Ray Garcia
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Q. Watson, Off-site Contracted Professional
Daniel Mann v. Doug Clark, Warden, et al
as 22-2750
Petitioner / Appellant:
Daniel Ray Mann
Respondent / Appellee:
Doug Clark, Warden, SDSP and Attorney General of South Dakota
GULLEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12617
Plaintiff:
DANIEL RAY GULLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In the Matter of Daniel Ray Gamez SBN 222578
as 3:2022mc80173
Respondent:
Daniel Ray Gamez
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
