Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Gipson v. Smith et al
as 1:2025cv04072
Plaintiff:
Darren Gipson
Defendant:
Matt Smith and Daniel Rubinstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Forenza (PS) v. Mesa County District Court et al
as 1:2025cv01865
Petitioner:
Pablo-Rocco Forenza
Respondent:
Mesa County District Court, Grace Shiftlet and Brittany Noland
Defendant:
State of Colorado, Mesa County Sheriff Office, Todd Rowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seehase (PS) v. State of Colorado, The et al
as 1:2025cv00108
Defendant:
American Family Insurance Company, Mark J. Jachimiak, Mesa County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Diana Seehase
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02279
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00792
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.