Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Wade v. United Property & Casualty Insurance Company
as 4:2018cv03002
Plaintiff: James Daniel Wade
Defendant: United Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Strong et al v. Marathon Resource Management Group, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00634
Plaintiff: Apollo Strong, Charles Stuart, Ashley Stuart and others
Defendant: Tripp Brightwell, James Stewart, Marathon Resource Management Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Fredrick Norwood, et al v. City of Mendenhall, MS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-60229
Plaintiff - Appellant: FREDRICK NORWOOD, VIRGINIA MCLAUREN and DANIELLE WADE
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF MENDENHALL, MISSISSIPPI, DONALD BRUCE BARLOW and CLAY HOLLOWELL
Norwood et al v. City of Mendenhall, Mississippi et al
as 3:2013cv00580
Plaintiff: Fredrick Norwood , Virginia McLauren and Danielle Wade
Defendant: City of Mendenhall, Mississippi, Donald Bruce Barlow, Clay Hollowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coots v. City of Kemah, Texas et al
as 4:2010cv05157
Plaintiff: Daniel Wade Coots
Defendant: City of Kemah, Texas , T. Wayne Lockett and Richard Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Coots v. City of Kemah et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00003
Plaintiff: Daniel Wade Coots
Defendant: City of Kemah , T. Wayne Lockett and Richard Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Wade v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-50862
Petitioner - Appellant: DANIEL WADE
Respondent - Appellee: RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Wade v. Quarterman
as 5:2008cv00932
Petitioner: Daniel Wade
Respondent: Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?