Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Eric Bates, et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 19-17094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSE LEWELLING, JOHNSON MANDAZ, JOHNNY O. SANCHEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Former Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, CARL WOFFORD, Warden, Avenal State Prison, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Former Governer of the State of California and others
Daniel Jones v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2017cv01275
Defendant:
Marion Ashley, John Benoit, County of Riverside and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Jones v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv03933
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Unknown Parties
as 4:2016cv00523
Plaintiff:
Bert Daniel Jones
Defendant:
Corizon Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 1:2014at00965
Plaintiff:
Eric Bates , Paul Blevins , Michael Blue and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jeffrey Beard, Paul Brazelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 1:2014cv02085
Plaintiff:
Eric Bates , Paul Blevins , Michael Blue and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jeffrey Beard, Paul Brazelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Brown et al v. Citibank USA, N.A. et al
as 2:2014cv07695
Plaintiff:
Juan Alzate, Ellen Baloun, Larry Baloun and others
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc., Citibank USA, N.A. and Does
Danielle Jones v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 2:2014cv06000
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Danielle Jones
Danielle Jones v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 2:2014cv04385
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Danielle Jones
Jones v. Brown, et al.
as 1:2014cv00124
Plaintiff:
Kazi Daniel Jones
Defendant:
Brown, Dunlap, Armendariz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
