Cases 1 - 10 of 1,719
MURRAY-BEY v. JONES et al
as 3:2024cv05738
Plaintiff:
DANNY-R: MURRAY-BEY
Defendant:
RODERICK JONES and NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sigman v. County of San Joaquin et al
as 2:2024cv01158
Plaintiff:
Danny Richard Sigman
Defendant:
County of San Joaquin, Tawni Hoskins, Joshua Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Alabama State Conference of the NAACP et al v. Marshall et al
as 2:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Alabama State Conference of the NAACP, League of Women Voters of Alabama, League of Women Voters of Alabama Education Fund and others
Defendant:
Steve Marshall, William R Adair, T Kirke Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelly v. O'Malley, et al
as 24-1306
Plaintiff:
DANNY M. KELLY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY and KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Agmon et al v. JetBlue Airways Corporation
as 1:2024cv02393
Plaintiff:
Danny Agmon, Edit Agmon, Eliot Agmon and others
Defendant:
JetBlue Airways Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
David v. Wasatch County Utah et al
as 2:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Lynn David
Defendant:
Wasatch County, Utah, Mark Nelson, Spencer Park and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
David v. Wasatch County, UT et al
as 2:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Lynn David
Defendant:
Wasatch County, UT, Mark Nelson, Spencer Park and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
