Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Foster, Sr. v. Wright et al
as 2:2026cv00716
Plaintiff:
Danny Foster, Sr.
Defendant:
Mrs. Wright, Stacy Thomas, Canon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Payne et al
as 3:2025cv00083
Plaintiff:
Danny Foster
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Christopher Budnik, Claudia Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Culclager et al
as 4:2025cv00052
Plaintiff:
Danny Foster
Defendant:
Aundrea F Culclager, James Smith, Guy Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00700
Defendant:
Ms. Anderson, Ms. Hooks, Ms. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Foster, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-13490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Foster v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00609
Plaintiff:
Danny Foster, Sr.
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, John Q. Hamm and Joseph Headley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-13116
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Foster v. Headley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00535
Plaintiff:
Danny Foster, Sr.
Defendant:
Joseph Headley, John Q. Hamm, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foster, Sr. v. Headley et al
as 2:2022cv00874
Petitioner:
Danny Foster, Sr.
Respondent:
Warden Joseph Headley, John Hamm, ADOC Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foster v. Ivey et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Danny Foster, Sr.
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley, Kay Ivey, Randolph County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
