Cases 21 - 30 of 153
Tucker v. Thomas
as 6:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Darius Tucker
Defendant:
Dr. Dilip Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINTUP v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00384
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC, CORRECTION OFFICER B. BUTLER, CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINTUP v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00380
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, K. VINARDI, CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINTUP v. SMITH et al
as 2:2022cv00309
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
M. SMITH, JR., C. WAINMAN, J. JOBE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAMUELS v. LONGNECKER ET AL
as 1:2022cv00228
Plaintiff:
DARIUS SAMUELS
Defendant:
DR. LONGNECKER, P.A. STROUP and NP KNEISS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINTUP v. VANIHEL
as 2:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Simmons et al
as 2:2022cv14249
Plaintiff:
Avion Lawson
Defendant:
Jake Simmons, Darius Gibson, Veronica Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINTUP v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
as 2:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, LAUREN CUPP, SAMUEL BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINTUP v. IDOC et al
as 2:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
IDOC, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINTUP v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
as 2:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, LAUREN CUPP, SAMUEL BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
