Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Flatness et al v. Burnett et al
as 4:2015cv00329
Plaintiff:
Bill Flatness and Ashley Smith
Defendant:
Gary Burnett, Bobby Derden, Elmer Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tatum v. City of Chattanooga, Tennessee et al
as 1:2013cv00210
Plaintiff:
Adam Jerome Tatum
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga, Tennessee , Officer Latoya Tate-Olk , Officer Daryl Slaughter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hardwick v. City of Chattanooga, Tennessee et al
as 1:2013cv00152
Plaintiff:
Joyce Hardwick
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga, Tennessee , Bobby Dodd , Adam Cooley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Roe et al v. Turner et al
as 4:2010cv01423
Plaintiff:
Jill Roe and Corey Robinson
Defendant:
Darrell Turner , Elmer Graham , Des Arc, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Welch v. Beebe, City of et al
as 4:2007cv00229
Plaintiff:
Millard Wayne Welch and Millard Wayne Welch
Defendant:
Beebe, City of, Beebe Police Department, Jess Odom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Moses Holloway, et al v. City of Des Arc Arkansas, et al
as 06-3890
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Moses Holloway and Lisa Holloway
Defendant:
City of Des Arc Arkansas, Leon Moon, in his individual and official capacity and Rick Parsons, in his individual and official capacity
Defendant - Appellee:
Darrell Turner, in his individual and official capacity, Larry Curtis, in his individual and official capacity, Glen Parsons, in his individual and official capacity and others
Moses Holloway, et al v. Leon Moon, et al
as 06-3738
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Moses Holloway and Lisa Holloway
Defendant:
City of Des Arc Arkansas, Darrell Turner, in his individual and official capacity, Larry Curtis, in his individual and official capacity and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Leon Moon, in his individual and official capacity and Rick Parsons, in his individual and official capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
