Cases 1 - 10 of 14
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv87496
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DARRYL L JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Darryl Jones v. Brian Williams, Sr., et al
as 16-16563
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRYL L. JONES, AKA Abulatif
Respondent - Appellee:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, Sr. and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jones v. Laxalt
as 2:2016cv01990
Plaintiff:
Darryl L. Jones
Defendant:
Adam Laxalt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Becnel
as 2:2014cv01822
Plaintiff:
Darryl L. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Mary Hotard Becnel
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Jones v. Williams et al
as 2:2013cv02235
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian Williams, Sr.
Petitioner:
Darryl L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Williams et al
as 2:2013cv01840
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Nevada and Brian Williams, Sr.
Petitioner:
Darryl L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darryl Jones v. Attorney General of the State, et al
as 13-16676
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRYL L. JONES, AKA Abulatif
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA and BRIAN WILLIAMS, Sr.
Jones v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv04041
Plaintiff:
Darryl L. Jones
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc. , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Pendergast & Associates, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Jones v. Williams et al
as 2:2011cv01453
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian Williams, Sr.
Petitioner:
Abulatif/Darryl L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Astrue
as 5:2011cv00121
Plaintiff:
Darryl L. Jones
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
