Cases 1 - 10 of 1,995
Conley v. United States Postal Service et al
as 4:2025cv00188
Plaintiff:
David Conley
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and UPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conley v. Cooper et al
as 4:2025cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Conley
Defendant:
Jacob Cooper and James Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2025cv00039
Plaintiff:
David Bailey
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Smothers v. Robertson et al
as 4:2025cv00165
Plaintiff:
Jason Smothers
Defendant:
Tim Robertson, US Marshals Service, David Ebert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haines v. Higgins et al
as 4:2025cv00152
Plaintiff:
David John Haines, Jr
Defendant:
Eric S Higgins, M Johninson and A Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gowan v. Mcmillon et al
as 5:2025cv05033
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Gowan
Defendant:
Carl D. Mcmillon, Caroline Baber, William A. Cash, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Williams v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2025cv04013
Plaintiff:
Randy Ellis Williams
Defendant:
Jason Mitchell, Public Defender John Pickett and Prosecuting Attorney David P. Cotten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gilberti v. Clinton et al
as 4:2025cv00123
Plaintiff:
Joseph D Gilberti, Jr
Defendant:
William Jefferson Clinton, George W Bush, Donna Marie Padar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Landreth v. Berry et al
as 4:2025cv00080
Plaintiff:
Rodger Landreth
Defendant:
Chad Berry, Teagus Majors and David Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Burnett v. Doe
as 4:2025cv00090
Plaintiff:
David D Burnett
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
