Cases 21 - 30 of 41
May v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as LAW/6:13-cv-01475
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
David Elden May
Berry et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as 1:2013cv01375
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Rose Berry , James Philip Bettinger Estate , George Blossey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
May v. Mahoney
as 3:2013cv00553
Respondent:
Dan Mahoney
Petitioner:
David L. May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. David May
as 12-40630
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID GLEN MAYS
The Bank of New York Mellon v. Mais et al
as 1:2012cv03313
Plaintiff:
The Bank of New York Mellon
Defendant:
David R Mais, Tuesday A Mais, HomeAmerican Credit Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David May v. Secretary, Florida Department
as 12-11513
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID L. MAY
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
MAY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv41414
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. MAY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
May v. Motel 6 GP Inc
as 1:2009cv00486
Plaintiff:
David L May
Defendant:
Motel 6 GP Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
May v. Iowa Department of Motor Vehicles
as 1:2009cv00487
Plaintiff:
David L May
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Motor Vehicles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
May v. Idaho Housing and Finance Association
as 1:2009cv00488
Plaintiff:
David L May
Defendant:
Idaho Housing and Finance Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
