Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv00692
Defendant:
David R. Jones, Elizabeth Carol Freeman, Jackson Walker, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Bouchard v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00693
Plaintiff:
Morton S Bouchard
Defendant:
David R Jones, Elizabeth Carol Freeman, Jackson Walker, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. Payne et al
as 1:2023cv00412
Plaintiff:
David Allen Jones
Defendant:
James Payne, Karren Price, LeAnn Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams et al v. Payne et al
as 1:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
Joe Daniel Adams, Christopher Scot Taylor, David Allen Jones and others
Defendant:
James Payne, Karren Price, LeAnn Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diogu et al v. Jones et al
as 4:2023cv03959
Plaintiff:
Diogu Kalu Diogu, II, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Defendant:
dft David Jones, Eduardo V. Rodriguez, T. Michael O'Conner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Deelen v. Jones
as 4:2023cv03729
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Van Deelen
Defendant:
David R. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. Bickham
as 22-30628
Petitioner / Appellant:
David A. Jones
Respondent / Appellee:
Dustin Bickham and Edward Bickham, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute
Jones v. Kent
as 22-30459
Petitioner / Appellant:
David A. Jones
Respondent / Appellee:
Jason Kent, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute
Jones v. River Services Company, L.L.C.
as 2:2022cv02241
Plaintiff:
David Bryan Jones
Defendant:
River Services Company, L.L.C. and XL Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104 Marine Personal Injury
Jones v. Shelby County Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2021cv02711
Plaintiff:
David Tyron Jones
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff Department and Shelby Mob
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
