Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Jones v. Warden et al
as 3:2024cv00338
Defendant:
Katie, Warden, Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
David Michael Jones
Not Yet Classified:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
WARDEN, BENNETT, OFFICERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. DWIGGINS et al
as 1:2023cv00483
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHEAL JONES
Defendant:
LEEANN DWIGGINS, MADISON COUNTY DRUG TASK FORCE, JAKE BROOKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. GRANT et al
as 1:2023cv00444
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
BRANDON GRANT, DARRON GRANGER, DUSTIN ARMSTRONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 1:2023cv00224
Petitioner:
DAVID MICHEAL JONES
Respondent:
MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF and CIRCUIT 6 COURT MADISON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Headd v. Jones et al
as 2:2022cv00315
Estate Plaintiff:
Vevke Anthony Headd
Defendant:
David M Jones and ERA Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
JONES v. ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2022cv00507
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOSHA BOWLING, MATTHEW KOPP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2021pq00669
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Chevron USA, Inc. and Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC
Plaintiff:
David W Jones
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. KOESTER et al
as 1:2021cv00282
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
RODNEY CUMMINS, STEVE KOESTER and DANIEL KOPP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03008
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
