Cases 1 - 10 of 27
TYLER v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Defendant:
DAVID B. SMITH, THE FORSYTH COUNTY L.E.D.C, ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN LUX RESEARCH et al v. HULL MCGUIRE PC et al
as 1:2023cv00523
Plaintiff:
IN LUX RESEARCH and LINDSAY OLSON
Defendant:
HULL MCGUIRE PC, JOHN DANIEL HULL, DAVID B. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
USA, et al v. Pavel Lazarenko
as 22-16163
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PAVEL IVANOVICH LAZARENKO
Not Yet Classified:
BLANK ROME LLP, FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP, THE LAW OFFICES OF DAVID B. SMITH, PLLC and others
TYLER v. WARREN et al
as 1:2021cv00496
Defendant:
JAMES O'NELL, DYLAN W. GREENWOOD, RANDOLPH and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. WELCH et al
as 1:2021cv00473
Defendant:
SARA Q. LOBNER, KELLY WELCH, WILLIAM L. OSTEAN, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. GREENWOOD et al
as 1:2021cv00319
Defendant:
PAUL A. SHANNER, DYLAN W. GREENWOOD, ANTON T. MCALLISTER and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. KEVEER et al
as 1:2021cv00316
Defendant:
DYLAN W. GREENWOOD, J. CLARK FISCHER, TIFFANY A. HALL and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. KEVEER et al
as 1:2021cv00060
Defendant:
DYLAN W. GREENWOOD, J. CLARK FISCHER, TIFFANY A. HALL and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. SAXTEN et al
as 1:2020cv01181
Defendant:
JUDITH D. JOSEY, JAMES O'NELL, PROSECUTORIAL DISTRICT and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. MCALLISTER et al
as 1:2020cv01117
Defendant:
DYLAN W. GREENWOOD, RONALD J. SHORT, ANTON T. MCALLISTER and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
