Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Grant et al v. David Beal, et al.
as 1:2026cv06077
Plaintiff: Shrick Grant
Defendant: David Beal and W.A. Kendall & Company, LLC doing business as Kendall Vegetation Services
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Chicago Headline Club et al v. Noem et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2025cv12173
Plaintiff: Chicago Headline Club, Block Club Chicago, Chicago Newspaper Guild Local 34071 and others
Defendant: Kristi Noem, Todd Lyons, Marcos Charles and others
: Service List
Amicus Curiae: City of Chicago
Intervenor: Chicago Public Media, Inc., Chicago Sun-Times Media, Inc. and Chicago Tribune Company, LLC
Petitioner: State of Illinois and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Quintana v. Quintana, et al
as 23-4086
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee: JERLINE QUINTANA, BOARD OF PARDONS, All Chair Members, DAVID BEAL, Parole Agent and others
David Beals v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2022cv03676
Defendant: 3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff: David Beals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Quintana v. Quintana et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00275
Plaintiff: Chastity Quintana
Defendant: Jerline Quintana, Board of Pardons, David Beal and others
Not Classified By Court: Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cross v. Great West Casualty Co et al
as 6:2019cv00622
Defendant: Lexington Insurance Co, Montgomery Trucking Company LLC, David Beal and others
Plaintiff: Paul Cross
Intervenor Plaintiff: Advantage Human Resourcing Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steve Chambers, et al v. Whirlpool Corporation, et al
as 16-56686
Plaintiff - Appellee: STEVE CHAMBERS, an individual and for all others similarly situated, LYNN VAN DER VEER, an individual and for all others similarly situated, JOSEPH CICCHELLI, an individual and for all others similarly situated and others
Objector - Appellant: KELLY KRESS
Defendant - Appellee: WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation and SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO., INC., a New York corporation
Steve Chambers, et al v. Whirlpool Corporation, et al
as 16-56688
Plaintiff - Appellee: STEVE CHAMBERS, an individual and for all others similarly situated, LYNN VAN DER VEER, an individual and for all others similarly situated, JOSEPH CICCHELLI, an individual and for all others similarly situated and others
Objector - Appellant: GEORGE P. LIACOPOULOS
Defendant - Appellee: WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation and SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO., INC., a New York corporation
Steve Chambers, et al v. Whirlpool Corporation, et al
as 16-56694
Plaintiff - Appellee: STEVE CHAMBERS, an individual and for all others similarly situated, LYNN VAN DER VEER, an individual and for all others similarly situated, JOSEPH CICCHELLI, an individual and for all others similarly situated and others
Objector - Appellant: W. ALLEN MCDONALD, Christopher T Cain for Objector
Defendant - Appellee: WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation and SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO., INC., a New York corporation
Steve Chambers, et al v. Whirlpool Corporation, et al
as 16-56684
Plaintiff - Appellee: STEVE CHAMBERS, an individual and for all others similarly situated, LYNN VAN DER VEER, an individual and for all others similarly situated, JOSEPH CICCHELLI, an individual and for all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellant: WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation and SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO., INC., a New York corporation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?