Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Christopher Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04990
Plaintiff:
Stacia Durst, Christopher Adams, Mike Alexander and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00776
Plaintiff:
Adams, Stacia Durst, Christopher Adams and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00776
Plaintiff:
Stacia Durst, Christopher Adams, Mike Alexander and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Gooden v. Sheriff's Dept. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2019cv00709
Defendant:
Amy Anderson, Fox News Corp., Bill Shacklett and others
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Gooden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carver v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, et al.
as 1:2018cv00164
Defendant:
The Commonwealth Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Kori L. Beck, The Commonwealth of Kentucky Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Anderson Carver, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Bragg
as 3:2016cv02919
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A. Sanders
Defendant:
David Bragg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bragg v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 1:2015cv00972
Plaintiff:
David Bragg
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hight v. Cox et al
as 3:2013cv00367
Plaintiff:
Daryl A. Hight
Defendant:
Dustin Cox, Allyson S. Abbott and David Bragg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Steve Balestrieri, et al v. Menlo Park Fire Protection Di
as 12-15975
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE BALESTRIERI, KEN BABCOCK, ROBERT S. BLACK, Jr. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MENLO PARK FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Balestrieri et al v. Menlo Park Fire Protection District
as 3:2010cv03102
Plaintiff:
Steve Balestrieri , Ken Babcock , Robert S. Black, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Menlo Park Fire Protection District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
