Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv07413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2014cv04571
Respondent:
NANCY A. GIROUX, JOHN E. WETZEL, KIMBERLY A. BARKLEY and others
Petitioner:
DAVID BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROWN v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2014cv04570
Petitioner:
DAVID BROWN
Respondent:
NANCY A. GIROUX, JOHN E. WETZEL, KIMBERLY A. BARKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROWN v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv00582
Plaintiff:
DAVID BROWN
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2013cv00331
Plaintiff:
DAVID BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN WILLIAMS, MICHAEL CARRINGTON, KIMBERLY A. BARKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUDLEY et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05877
Plaintiff:
LINDA DUDLEY , ALESIA DIGGS , DARLENE BRACEY and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2013cv00148
Petitioner:
DAVID BROWN
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01476
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
BROWN et al v. MERCK, SHARP & DOHME, CORP.
as 3:2013cv00250
Plaintiff:
HARRIETT C. BROWN and DAVID BROWN
Defendant:
MERCK, SHARP & DOHME, CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mark V. Morin v. 20/20 Companies, et al
as 12-3884
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK V. MORIN
Defendant - Appellee:
20/20 COMPANIES, VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC, JOSHUA MICHAEL FANELLI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
