Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 130
USA v. Boyd
as 23-10695
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: David Earl Boyd
Strange v. TDCJ-CID
as 5:2023cv00076
Plaintiff: David Earl Strange
Defendant: TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spillman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv00669
Petitioner: David Earl Spillman, Jr
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spillman Jr v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv00668
Petitioner: David Earl Spillman, Jr
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spillman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv00670
Petitioner: David Earl Spillman, Jr
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Strange v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2023cv00014
Petitioner: David Earl Strange
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herrington v. Benaudt
as 2:2022cv00103
Plaintiff: David Earl Herrington
Defendant: Officer David Benaudt
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley v. Morgan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv01655
Plaintiff: David Earl Stanley and David Stanley
Defendant: City of Lafayette, Thomas Glover, Scott Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Kates v. USA
as 2:2022cv00008
Petitioner: David Earl Kates
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fenner et al. v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
as 4:2021cv03854
Defendant: NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC d/b/a MR. COOPER, DAVID EARL FENNER, KIMBERLY ANNE FENNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?