Cases 1 - 8 of 8
GLADDEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19638
Plaintiff:
DAVID GLADDEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mary Smith, et al v. Asa Hutchinson, et al
as 21-2904
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mary Louise Smith and Tiffany E. Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
Asa Hutchinson, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Arkansas, Arkansas Department of Human Services, Cindy Gillespie, in her official capacity as Director of the Arkansas Department of Human Services and others
Defendant:
David Gladden, Individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Osceola Police Department and Dickie Kennemore, Individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of Osceola Arkansas
Smith et al v. Hutchinson et al
as 3:2019cv00082
Defendant:
Sylvia Wear, Cindy Gillespie, Alfred Hogan and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Louise Smith and Tiffany E Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matlock v. Ephlin et al
as 2:2018cv00155
Plaintiff:
Zyrion Matlock
Defendant:
Osceola Arkansas, City of, Jennifer Ephlin and David Gladden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Artis v. Gladden et al
as 3:2016cv00114
Plaintiff:
Dexter Artis
Defendant:
David Gladden, Ollie Collins, Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vornes v. Skaggs et al
as 3:2014cv00140
Plaintiff:
Terriek Vornes
Defendant:
William Skaggs, Ollie Collins and David Gladden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Osceola, City of et al
as 3:2014cv00050
Plaintiff:
Landon Chandler
Defendant:
Osceola, City of, Dicky Kennemore, David Gladden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cannon v. Osceola Police Department et al
as 3:2010cv00270
Plaintiff:
Charles Palmer Cannon, Jr
Defendant:
Osceola Police Department, David Gladden, Rouszer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
