Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Mize et al v. Morgan & Morgan, P.A. et al
as 1:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Nancy Mize and Charles Mize
Defendant:
Morgan & Morgan, P.A., Morgan & Morgan, PLLC, Morgan & Morgan, DBA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
GOLDING v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12093
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVID GOLDING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nachmenson v. Gluck et al
as 1:2022cv00627
Plaintiff:
Nachman Nachmenson
Defendant:
Zvi Gluck, NY State Court, Judge Katherine A. Levine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robles v. United States Attorney et al
as 3:2018cv00370
Plaintiff:
Rolando Robles
Defendant:
United States Attorney , Attorney General of the United States , Ndidi N. Moses and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robles v. United States Attorney et al
as 3:2017cv00296
Plaintiff:
Rolando Robles
Defendant:
United States Attorney, Attorney General, Dannel Malloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gold v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00073
Plaintiff:
Bernard David Gold
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc., Mike Carroll, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson et al v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv00101
Plaintiff:
Gregory O'Neil Henderson, Pedro Pedroza, Steve Hoo and others
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc., Mike Carroll, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Great Lengths Universal Hair Extensions S.r.l., et al v. Gold, et al.
as 1:2016cv00193
Plaintiff:
Great Lengths Universal Hair Extensions S.r.l. and HairUWear, Inc.
Defendant:
David Gold , Thomas Gold , Jessica Gold and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 205
United States of America v. Mitchell David Gold
as 2:2015cv01487
Defendant:
Mitchell David Gold
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Mitchell David Gold
as 8:2015cv00342
Defendant:
Mitchell David Gold
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
