Cases 1 - 10 of 12
James Scott v. G. Guntharp, et al
as 10-3062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James S. Scott
Defendant - Appellee:
G. David Guntharp, Director, Arkansas Department of Community Correction and Willard Proctor, Jr., Circuit Judge, Sixth Judicial District of Arkansas
Mark Davis v. Walter Hollaway, et al
as 10-2109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mark R. Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
Walter Hollaway, CMS, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, Anthony Thomas, Wendy Kelly, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Davis v. Hollaway et al
as 2:2010cv00035
Plaintiff:
Mark R Davis
Defendant:
Walter Hollaway, Anthony Thomas, Kelly Wendy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byler v. Guntharp
as 5:2010cv00012
Plaintiff:
Tony Byler
Defendant:
David Guntharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steven Bonds v. G. David Guntharp
as 09-3425
Petitioner - Appellant:
Steven E. Bonds
Respondent - Appellee:
G. David Guntharp, Director, Arkansas Department of Community Correction
Setzke v. Cobb et al
as 2:2009cv00024
Plaintiff:
Raymond Setzke
Defendant:
Cobb, Winfrey, Dover and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Setzke v. Ms. Cobb, et al
as 5:2009cv05041
Plaintiff:
Raymond Setzke
Defendant:
Cobb, Winfrey, Unknown Subordinate of Records and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Zarychta v. Ivy et al
as 5:2008cv00150
Plaintiff:
Patricia Zarychta
Defendant:
Joseph Ivy, G David Guntharp, Rick Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 07-3473
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lewis et al v. Norris et al
as 5:2007cv00163
Plaintiff:
Kristoffer Kyle Lewis, Kristoffer Kyle Lewis, Nolan Scott Lewis and others
Defendant:
Larry B Norris, Wayne Smith, George Hunsza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
