Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Agness McCury, et al v. Thomas Wright, et al
as 24-5208
Plaintiff:
ETHA JONES and AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant:
JUDGE THOMAS J. WRIGHT, BENJAMIN CURTIS MCCURRY, KELLY J. MCCURRY and others
Etha Jones, et al v. Thomas Wright, et al
as 24-5196
Plaintiff:
ETHA JONES and AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant:
JUDGE THOMAS J. WRIGHT, BENJAMIN CURTIS MCCURRY, KELLY J. MCCURRY and others
Agness McCurry, et al v. Thomas Wright, et al
as 23-5929
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ETHA JONES and AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE THOMAS J. WRIGHT, BENJAMIN CURTIS MCCURRY, KELLY J. MCCURRY and others
Ocampo v. Harris et al
as 1:2022cv01972
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ocampo
Defendant:
David Harris, David Mack and Max R. Letterly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aples et al v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund et al
as 2:2021cv00046
Defendant:
Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund, Joseph Elfer, Sodexo, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Alneisha Polite and Taivon Aples
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aples et al v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Trust et al
as 2:2020cv02451
Defendant:
Administrators of the Tulane Educational Trust, Harris David, denis Serena and others
Plaintiff:
Alneisha Polite and Taivon Aples
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carson v. County of Stanislaus et al
as 1:2020cv00747
Defendant:
Marlissa Ferreira, City of Modesto, City of Ceres and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Carson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wangerow v. Agent Cohen 6837 et al
as 1:2019cv02879
Defendant:
Agent Porter, Agent Tittle 6005, Lt. Jeffrey Kirschner and others
Plaintiff:
Larry William Wangerow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
